IYABOKO Science & Technology
Digital Technology · Evidence · Engineering
☰
Digital Technology
Industries
Services
Company
Govern continuity, recovery and bounded authority re-entry with independent evidence.
SACG is IYABOKO’s continuity-authority and proof infrastructure. It is designed for systems where successful recovery must not automatically restore prior authority. SACG structures continuation proof, evidence reconciliation, policy gates and accountable re-entry into bounded authority.
Separate technical recovery from permission to act.
SACG addresses a specific trust problem: a recovered system can be operational while still lacking sufficient evidence to regain consequential authority.
Continuation Proof
Represent evidence that a recovered system, identity, service or agent is a valid continuation of an authorised prior state.
Independent Evidence
Combine heterogeneous evidence without assuming that one telemetry source, vendor or recovered component can prove itself.
Distributed Decision Support
Use correlation-aware evidence and quorum logic where one source or one failure domain is insufficient.
Bounded Re-Entry
Restore only the authority justified by policy, evidence, continuation state and required Human Authority.
Turn continuity evidence into a reviewable authority-state decision.
The architecture is designed so that evidence can support authority without automatically creating it.
Continuation Proof Object
Canonical object for linking identity, prior authorised state, recovery event, evidence set, confidence/limits and permitted next state.
Cross-Vendor Evidence Reconciliation
Normalise and reconcile heterogeneous evidence so trust does not depend on one vendor-specific format or one component view.
Authority & Continuity Ledger
Maintain a traceable record of state transitions, proof decisions, authority ceilings, denials, re-entry and later review.
Fail closed when continuation evidence is insufficient or contradictory.
SACG is designed around explicit limits rather than optimistic restoration.
Authority Ceilings
A recovered component can be restricted to observation, analysis or bounded actions until stronger evidence exists.
Tamper & Divergence Detection
Expose evidence conflicts, continuity breaks, unexpected state divergence and integrity concerns.
Policy-Constrained Re-Entry
Require the project’s policy, role, system class and consequence level to determine what recovery can permit.
Human Authority Gate
Preserve explicit approval for cases where technical proof alone is not sufficient to restore consequential authority.
SACG is a specialised continuity-authority plane—not a replacement for C3, CoreINTEL, Sentinel, BOKOMUTO or Core OS.
Its role is narrow and deliberate: govern recovery, continuation and authority-state re-entry where those questions materially affect trust or safety.
Computational Context
C3 may compute or analyse recovery-related information; it does not independently restore authority.
Project Intelligence
CoreINTEL relates continuity evidence to project state, dependencies and decision context.
Assurance
Sentinel challenges evidence and readiness; SACG governs the specialised continuity-authority question.
Physical Systems
Recovered engineering or edge systems remain subject to local safety, hardware and qualified operational authority.
AI Agents
Recovered AI capability does not regain consequential permissions simply because the software is running again.
State & Identity
Core OS carries identity and state context; SACG applies continuation proof and bounded authority logic where required.
Apply SACG where continuity and authority must remain distinguishable.
The architecture is most relevant to distributed, high-assurance or recovery-sensitive systems.
Service & Infrastructure Recovery
Assess whether recovered services should regain bounded operational permissions after failover or restoration.
Identity & Credential Continuity
Separate credential availability from evidence that the identity/session is an authorised continuation.
AI Agent Re-Entry
Require evidence, policy and authority checks before recovered or migrated agents regain privileged actions.
Hardware / Edge Continuity
Support bounded software authority while physical safety and actuation remain governed by local controls and qualified operators.
Apply continuity proof and bounded authority re-entry across ten specialist contexts.
The SACG continuity model remains consistent while evidence sources, failure modes, consequence levels, local safety controls and external authority requirements change by sector.
Space & Aerospace
Mission services, ground systems, spacecraft-support software, identity continuity and evidence-bound recovery.
Open sectorEnergy
Energy services, storage, control-plane continuity, infrastructure recovery and bounded operational re-entry.
Open sectorHealth & Biotechnology
Research systems, data and identity continuity under non-clinical, privacy and specialist-review constraints.
Open sectorQuantum Network
Quantum and secure-network continuity, post-quantum trust evidence, identity and cross-domain recovery context.
Open sectorMinerals & Materials
Processing, laboratory, data and industrial-system continuity where physical authority remains locally controlled.
Open sectorAgriculture & Environment
Field, water, sensing, environmental and resilience systems with evidence-aware restoration and re-entry.
Open sectorManufacturing & Robotics
Robotics, CNC and edge-system recovery while machinery safety and physical actuation remain locally governed.
Open sectorTransport & Logistics
Fleet, mobility, logistics, routing and infrastructure continuity with bounded authority after failover.
Open sectorDigital Infrastructure
Cloud, edge, compute, identity, network and platform recovery where continuity evidence can directly affect privileges.
Open sectorEducation & Research
Research infrastructure, institutional systems, laboratories and learning platforms with governed state continuity.
Open sectorPresent SACG as a governed architecture with capability-specific evidence.
Public positioning should not imply that every continuity, quorum, hardware-trust or cross-vendor component is already independently validated.
| Capability class | Posture | Evidence boundary |
|---|---|---|
| Continuity-authority model, proof objects and policy logic | Defined software architecture | Supports implementation and testing; does not itself prove a deployed system trustworthy. |
| Cross-vendor evidence reconciliation and quorum workflows | Controlled / integration-dependent | Requires implementation evidence and project-specific source integration. |
| Hardware trust, distributed recovery and high-assurance runtime | Developing capability | Requires appropriate hardware, adversarial, HIL and external validation. |
| Safety, regulatory or statutory authority restoration | External authority required | SACG cannot replace authorised operators, certifiers, regulators or statutory decision-makers. |
Design continuity so recovery cannot silently recreate authority.
Bring a continuity-sensitive system, service or AI/edge architecture to IYABOKO for scoped evidence, proof, policy and assurance design.