EVIDENCE · PUBLIC INDEX

Make technology claims easier to inspect.

The IYABOKO Public Evidence Index is designed to provide a clearer place for selected public claims, evidence status, methods, limitations, version context and external review status. The objective is traceable credibility rather than unsupported certainty.

Claim register Evidence status Limitations Methods External review Version context
Public Evidence Structure

A public claim should show more than the claim itself.

Where suitable for public disclosure, evidence entries can make the claim, supporting context, validation level and limitations easier to understand.

Claim

Claim Register

State the specific capability, result or technology claim being presented.

Status

Evidence Status

Show whether support is demonstrative, internal, independently reviewed or otherwise qualified.

Boundary

Known Limitations

Keep assumptions, exclusions, untested conditions and unresolved questions visible.

Method

Methods & Context

Describe the relevant method, test conditions, inputs or evaluation context.

External

External Review Status

Distinguish proposed, pending and completed external review without overstating the relationship.

Version

Versioned Updates

Keep evidence connected to the relevant system version, test state or publication update.

Evidence Status

Use evidence labels that communicate what has actually happened.

The public index should avoid treating all evidence states as equivalent.

01

Demonstrated

A capability or behaviour has been shown under defined demonstration or test conditions.

02

Internally Evaluated

Documented internal analysis, testing or structured evaluation has been completed.

03

Externally Reviewed

An appropriately qualified external party has actually reviewed the relevant material.

04

Formal External Status

Certification or other formal status is stated only where the applicable process has genuinely been completed.

Evidence Publication Path

Define → Support → Limit → Review → Version → Publish.

Public evidence becomes stronger when publication does not remove the limitations that existed during evaluation.

01 Define State the exact claim.
02 Support Connect the claim to relevant evidence.
03 Limit State boundaries and unresolved conditions.
04 Review Check technical and evidence language.
05 Version Connect evidence to the correct system state.
06 Publish Present the public position accurately.
Public Evidence Boundary

Public evidence should strengthen credibility without expanding the claim.

Evidence publication should reflect what was actually tested, reviewed or demonstrated. It should not transform an internal result into independent validation, a controlled demonstration into production proof, or a proposed external relationship into completed endorsement.

Claims

Claim Only What Is Supported

The wording of a public claim should remain proportional to the evidence available.

Context

Keep Limitations Visible

Test conditions, assumptions, version limits and unresolved gaps remain part of the evidence story.

External Review

Pending ≠ Completed

External review, collaboration or certification should only be presented as completed when it actually is.

Evidence Before Claims

Build public technology credibility from traceable evidence.

Explore validation, demonstration, governance and public evidence pathways across the IYABOKO technology platform.

Public demonstrations are simulation environments unless explicitly stated otherwise. IYABOKO supports research, computational analysis, evidence organisation, readiness assessment, simulation, engineering and software/hardware prototype pathways. Public evidence entries should be interpreted within their stated methods, conditions, versions and limitations. They do not by themselves establish certification, regulatory approval or unrestricted production readiness. Computational intelligence informs authority; it does not replace accountable Human Authority.
© 2026 IYABOKO Science & Technology – Software & Hardware.