Energy OS · SENTINEL Energy · Commercial Runtime Pathway

Move from energy-system readiness to evidence-backed runtime assurance.

Energy OS connects IYABOKO’s existing Sentinel 20 and Sentinel 36 assurance software with SENTINEL Energy SIM and the emerging SENTINEL EAC-1 edge-assurance controller — creating one governed pathway from project readiness to real BESS pilot evidence.

Assess · Assure · Simulate · Monitor · Validate · Scale
Software-led Hardware-enabled Evidence-gated Human-governed
Sentinel 20 Pre-deployment decision assurance
Sentinel 36 Engineering assurance & remediation
SENTINEL EAC-1 Runtime evidence-gated energy assurance
P4 Pilot Real BESS telemetry · read-only assurance
Operating Context

For energy projects that need clearer evidence before capital, installation or deployment decisions.

Energy OS supports early-stage planning, resilience analysis, storage and continuity reasoning, evidence organisation and prototype-readiness preparation without presenting preliminary work as certified engineering design.

01

Generation Systems

Solar, distributed generation, source assumptions, resource context and generation-readiness evidence.

02

Storage & Backup

Battery, backup, continuity, redundancy and resilience assumptions with traceable evidence.

03

Microgrids & Resilience

Demand, supply, prioritisation, continuity scenarios, outage response and system dependencies.

04

Prototype & Pilot Readiness

Requirements, evidence gaps, testing logic, supplier assumptions and controlled next-step planning.

What Energy OS Supports

Make energy-system assumptions, evidence and dependencies easier to govern.

Energy OS helps teams organise the evidence needed to understand continuity, resilience and prototype readiness before moving into installation, engineering approval or large-scale deployment.

Energy System Planning

  • Generation and load context
  • Storage and backup concepts
  • Microgrid boundary definition
  • Continuity and resilience objectives
  • Assumption and requirement registers

Evidence & Scenario Analysis

  • Source and demand evidence organisation
  • Storage-duration assumptions
  • Outage and resilience scenarios
  • Prototype test planning
  • Evidence quality and maturity mapping

Readiness & Governance

  • Sentinel 20 readiness assessment
  • Sentinel 36 digital assurance
  • Findings and remediation cases
  • Independent closure preparation
  • Engineering / installer handoff
Connected Products

Energy OS uses three customer products plus the shared Core OS foundation.

AI Workspace, Sentinel and Education Pact are the customer-facing products; Core OS remains the shared evidence and governance foundation beneath them.

Prepare

AI Workspace

Energy research support, evidence organisation, system notes, reports and project preparation.

Open AI Workspace
Assess · Assure

Sentinel OS

Readiness, digital assurance, findings, remediation, closure review and rescan-confirmed progression.

Explore Sentinel OS
Govern

Core OS

Evidence, maturity, roles, case state, auditability, authority and bounded automation.

Explore Core OS
Build Capability

Education Pact

Energy-systems learning, continuity reasoning, evidence and responsible technology capability.

Explore Education Pact
SENTINEL Energy Product Architecture

Assess → Assure → Simulate → Operate → Scale.

SENTINEL Energy extends the existing Sentinel assurance architecture into energy simulation and physical-system runtime evidence. Sentinel 20 and 36 keep their existing roles; EAC-1 becomes the first physical runtime embodiment.

Assess

Sentinel 20

Pre-deployment decision assurance for readiness, evidence quality, critical controls and the smallest justified next step.

  • Project boundary
  • Evidence quality
  • Critical conditions
  • Progression decision
Assure

Sentinel 36

Deeper requirements, evidence, risk, findings, remediation, closure and reassessment for engineering programmes.

  • Requirements
  • Findings
  • Remediation
  • Closure evidence
Simulate

SENTINEL Energy SIM

Controlled BESS and microgrid scenarios for digital-twin testing, fault injection, replay and validation evidence.

  • Virtual BESS
  • Sensor faults
  • Thermal trends
  • Repeatable scenarios
Operate

SENTINEL EAC-1

Emerging evidence-gated energy assurance controller for real telemetry, independent runtime assessment and operator support.

  • Evidence integrity
  • Dual analysis
  • Uncertainty
  • Action authority
Scale

SENTINEL Energy Fleet

Future multi-site operational assurance for portfolio evidence, event comparison and enterprise oversight.

  • Multi-site
  • Fleet evidence
  • Version control
  • Enterprise reporting
SENTINEL EAC-1 Runtime Assurance

The first physical-energy embodiment of the Sentinel assurance architecture.

EAC-1 is designed as an independent assurance layer above existing BMS and plant protection — not as a replacement for the customer’s primary safety system.

Evidence-gated operational pathway

In P4, EAC-1 receives approved telemetry and converts it into a traceable operator-facing assurance state.

01 Real BESS / microgrid telemetry 02 Evidence qualification & provenance 03 Deterministic engineering assessment 04 Predictive / anomaly assessment 05 Uncertainty & cross-channel concordance 06 Dynamic Action-Authority Envelope 07 Operator advisory / governed response 08 Hash-linked assurance record
Pre-decision

Sentinel 20

Should the project progress, and under what conditions?

Engineering lifecycle

Sentinel 36

Are requirements, findings, risks and remediation adequately controlled?

Runtime

EAC-1

Given the present physical evidence, what response is currently justified?

Commercial Pilot Programme

SENTINEL EAC-1 Pilot Site 001

IYABOKO is preparing its first Australian real-world validation deployment with a BESS, microgrid, energy laboratory or renewable-energy integration partner.

First paid deployment: P4 Read-Only Assurance

The customer retains the existing BMS, protection system, inverter controls, SCADA and site safety authority. SENTINEL receives an approved telemetry copy and independently creates an assurance record.

Target environment Real BESS / microgrid / energy laboratory
Typical pilot 8–12 weeks after commissioning
Data path Approved read-only gateway / API / historian
Control path Disabled by P4 design
Indicative pilot range · A$25,000–A$75,000 + GST Final scope depends on telemetry interfaces, asset count, cybersecurity, reporting depth, travel/site work and independent sensing.
Validation Status

State what is demonstrated — and what is not yet demonstrated.

IYABOKO separates internal verification, pilot evidence, external review and certification rather than treating them as equivalent.

Internally verified

Alpha software architecture

Executable simulation, evidence qualification, dual analysis, action authority and command gating.

Internally verified

Frozen scenario suite

Controlled normal, thermal, sensor, stale-data, disagreement and prohibited-command scenarios.

Seeking partner

Real Australian BESS pilot

P4 live telemetry, read-only assurance and customer-reviewed operational evidence.

Not yet claimed

External validation / certification

Independent university/engineering validation and product certification remain future gates.

Closed-Loop Energy Assurance

Assess → Assure → Simulate → Pilot → Detect → Remediate → Verify → Reassess.

Operational events should feed back into engineering assurance rather than disappearing into an isolated monitoring dashboard.

01 Prepare Define energy context, demand, supply, continuity objectives and evidence.
02 Assess Use Sentinel 20 to expose readiness gaps and boundary issues.
03 Assure Use Sentinel 36 to examine requirements, evidence, risks and dependencies.
04 Remediate Create governed cases with owners, actions and required evidence.
05 Review Separate remediation from closure and involve the appropriate reviewer.
06 Progress Rescan, confirm improvement and hand off to engineering or installation authority where needed.
Example Outputs

Produce practical artefacts before the next investment or deployment step.

Outputs are preparation and readiness artefacts, not electrical certification or guaranteed performance statements.

ECB

Energy Continuity Brief

Demand, supply, storage, backup assumptions, continuity priorities and evidence gaps.

LRM

Load & Resilience Map

Critical loads, outage scenarios, continuity priorities and unresolved dependencies.

SEM

Storage Evidence Map

Storage assumptions, source evidence, operating scenarios, constraints and confidence.

MRM

Microgrid Readiness Map

System boundary, generation, storage, controls, interfaces and readiness position.

PRR

Pilot / Prototype Roadmap

Requirements, test steps, suppliers, dependencies, evidence needs and stage gates.

GOV

Governance & Handoff Pack

Findings, remediation status, residual issues and specialist-review requirements.

Evidence & Readiness

Separate promising energy ideas from evidence-supported readiness.

Energy OS inherits Core OS maturity and evidence-quality architecture so feasibility assumptions, simulations, prototypes and validated performance are not treated as the same level of evidence.

H0–H6 Maturity Tracks progression from concept toward increasingly controlled evidence and deployment preparation.
Q0–Q5 Evidence Quality Makes evidence strength, provenance and limitations visible.
Sentinel Findings Turns material gaps into owners, requirements, remediation actions and review states.
Rescan Confirmation Checks whether remediation changed the original finding before progression.

Become an early SENTINEL EAC-1 validation or pilot partner.

IYABOKO is seeking one Australian BESS, microgrid, energy laboratory or renewable-energy integration partner for Pilot Site 001 and independent technical evaluation.