What is IYABOKO Science & Technology?

IYABOKO Science & Technology – Software & Hardware is a Queensland-based platform for AI Workspace, CoreOS workflow, Continuity OS readiness, research support, evidence review, governance, and consultation pathways.

What is the main IYABOKO pathway?

The main pathway is AI Workspace to Continuity OS to Demo Lab to Validation to Governance to Consultation.

Does IYABOKO replace professional advice?

No. IYABOKO provides AI-assisted research, writing, planning, workflow, readiness scoring, evidence review, support, and consultation services. Outputs do not replace qualified professional judgement.

S20

IYABOKO SENTINEL

Sentinel 20

Commercial Edition Product 3.3 Methodology 1.1 EDC-R 1.0

DECISION ASSURANCE & READINESS INTELLIGENCE

Sentinel 20

Evidence-governed decision assurance for complex projects, systems and programmes.

Structure evidence, expose critical gaps, challenge assumptions, test decision robustness, explore scenarios, manage corrective actions and maintain an auditable progression record from one integrated workspace.

Evidence Intelligence 20-Principle Assessment Critical Controls Scenario Lab Decision Robustness Action Management Audit History

Methodology & Assurance Product versions, assurance status and decision-use boundaries

View

Product Status Commercial Software

Product Version 3.3

Methodology Sentinel 20 v1.1

Scientific Core EDC-R 1.0

Robustness Engine 1.2

Scenario LSE 0.1

Decision Schema 4.2

Claim Policy Evidence-Bounded

Decision-use boundary

Sentinel 20 is commercial decision-assurance software. Its outputs structure readiness, evidence, uncertainty, contradictions, critical conditions, scenarios and bounded progression. Sentinel outputs do not by themselves constitute certification, regulatory approval, professional sign-off, engineering authority, clinical authority, legal advice, financial advice or a probability of success.

Methodology assurance

Commercial product status is separate from methodology validation status. External scientific validation, certification, accreditation or independent benchmarking are only claimed where corresponding documented evidence exists.

Decision Assurance Workspace

Readiness, evidence and progression intelligence.

Review current readiness, evidence sufficiency, critical controls, decision robustness and progression from one integrated workspace.

Evidence-Supported Readiness — Median supported R level

NRPI — Descriptive ordinal profile index

Evidence Sufficiency INSUFFICIENT Evidence not assessed

Critical Conditions 0 Fail / Review / Refer / Unknown

Progression Position

INSUFFICIENT BASIS

Define the decision boundary.

Readiness assessment coverage 0%

Evidence Coverage 0%

Traceability 0%

Critical Evidence Coverage 0%

Material Defeaters 0

Assessment Framework

Readiness · R0–R5

U: Unassessable.
R0: Demonstrably absent.
R1: Recognised.
R2: Defined.
R3: Implemented.
R4: Verified.
R5: Demonstrated & Controlled.
N/A: Outside justified scope.

Evidence · Q0–Q5

QU: Unassessable.
Q0: Unsupported.
Q1: Indicative.
Q2: Documented.
Q3: Corroborated.
Q4: Controlled & Traceable.
Q5: High Assurance.

Evidence Constraint

Declared readiness is not automatically accepted. Linked evidence limits the level that can be defensibly supported.

Current evidence-readiness ceilings are operational settings subject to future calibration.

Non-Compensation

Material contradictory evidence or unresolved critical conditions cannot be erased by high average scores elsewhere.

Step 1 · Define

Project & Decision Boundary

Define the project, operating context, consequence tier and one bounded decision question.

Methodology 1.1

Project / Assessment Name * Decision Record ID Assessment Date Primary Domain Consequence / Assurance Tier * Present Stage Intended Next Stage Assessment Type Assessment Scope * Main Decision / Question *

Reviewer Governance

Independent-review status requires recorded competence, independence and conflict-of-interest information.

Reviewer Name Organisation Discipline Competence Basis Previous Involvement Independence Declaration Conflict-of-Interest Declaration

Information handling

Sentinel does not automatically save assessment data to localStorage or sessionStorage. Export the Decision Record when deliberate retention is required.

Step 2 · Evidence

Evidence Intelligence

0 records

ID	Title	Type	Source	Owner	Date	Version	Declared Q	Direction	Directness	Independence	Method	Applicability	Limitations	Uncertainty	Defeater	Severity

Evidence control

Principle-level evidence support cannot exceed the admissible support of the linked evidence set. Contradictory evidence remains visible and may block critical progression.

Step 4 · Control

Critical Controls

Critical conditions use non-compensatory logic. High overall readiness cannot cancel unresolved material evidence, authority or boundary failures.

Principle	Criticality	Supported R	Supported Q	Defeater	Control State	Reason

Step 5 · Stress-Test

Decision Robustness

Test whether the current progression position remains stable when the assessment is exposed to declared synthetic stresses.

Engine 1.2

Stress Model Runs Readiness Stress Evidence Stress Reproducibility Seed

Decision Robustness —

NRPI Envelope —

NEPI Envelope —

Run Fingerprint —

Decision-State Distribution

Run the stress test to populate this analysis.

Step 6 · Explore

Scenario Lab

Explore hypothetical interventions without modifying the official assessment.

LSE 0.1

Build a Scenario

Scenario Name Target Principle Intervention Hypothetical Evidence Grade Hypothetical Provenance Contradiction Severity Scenario Note

Official Assessment → Hypothetical Scenario

OFFICIAL ASSESSMENT

Current

Supported Readiness —

Supported Evidence —

Target Control —

Evidence Sufficiency —

Progression Position —

→

SIMULATED · NOT ACTUAL EVIDENCE

Hypothetical

Supported Readiness —

Supported Evidence —

Target Control —

Evidence Sufficiency —

Progression Position —

Decision Effect Path

This displays Sentinel decision logic. It is not a physical causal model.

Run a scenario to see how an intervention propagates through evidence, readiness, controls and progression.

Real-World Requirement

No scenario has been run.

Scenario Experiment Log

ID	Scenario	Principle	Intervention	Official Position	Scenario Position	Changed	Fingerprint
No scenario experiments recorded.

Model Governance

Simulation Model Registry

Register physical, analytical, statistical, logical or data-driven models before relying on them for advanced simulation.

Model Name Model Type Version Credibility Stage Applicable Range / Domain Known Limitations

ID	Name	Type	Version	Stage	Applicable Range	Limitations

Step 7 · Act

Action & Closure Management

Convert gaps into accountable actions. Closing an action does not automatically increase readiness; closure evidence must support reassessment.

ID	Principle	Action	Owner	Status	Due	Closure Evidence

Step 8 · Reassess

Assessment History

Maintain append-only baseline and reassessment snapshots in the exported Decision Record.

No baseline snapshot has been created.

ID	Type	Timestamp	Position	NRPI	Evidence	Fingerprint

Step 9 · Report

Sentinel 20 Assurance Report

Summarise evidence-supported readiness, critical controls, evidence sufficiency, decision robustness and progression.

Readiness

Assessment incomplete.

Evidence

Assessment incomplete.

Critical Controls

Assessment incomplete.

Progression

No defensible progression conclusion is available.

Robustness

Stress test not run.

Evidence Integrity

Evidence register not assessed.

Overall Evidence-Supported Finding Priority Conditions / Gaps Smallest Justified Next Evidence Action Assessment Limitations

IYABOKO SENTINEL

Evidence before confidence.

Define → Evidence → Challenge → Assess → Stress-Test → Explore → Act → Reassess → Report

Sentinel OS Contact IYABOKO

IYABOKO Sentinel 20 · Commercial Edition · Product 3.3 · Methodology 1.1 · EDC-R Core 1.0 · Robustness Engine 1.2 · Scenario Engine LSE 0.1